Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31188848›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

First-line tuberculosis drug resistance patterns and associated risk factors in Germany, 2008-2017.

Saskia Glasauer, Doris Altmann, Barbara Hauer, Bonita Brodhun, Walter Haas, Nita Perumal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Distribution ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A Saudi Arabian Public Health Perspective of Tuberculosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saskia GlasauerInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology-IBE, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2236-3545
Doris AltmannDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Barbara HauerDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Bonita BrodhunDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Walter HaasDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Nita PerumalDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), especially multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), poses a threat to public health. While standard surveillance focuses on Rifampicin and/or Isoniazid resistance, little is known about other resistance patterns. This study aims to identify predominant drug resistance (DR) patterns in Germany and risk factors associated with them in order to inform diagnostic and treatment strategies.

methodsCase-based TB surveillance data notified in Germany from 2008-2017 were utilized to investigate DR and MDR-TB patterns for Isoniazid (H), Rifampicin (R), Pyrazinamide (Z), Ethambutol (E), and Streptomycin (S). Predominant patterns were further analyzed stratified by sex, age, country of birth, prior TB, and disease site. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine risk factors associated with any resistance, MDR-TB, and complete HRZES resistance.

results26,228 cases with complete DST results were included in the study, among which 3,324 cases had any DR (12.7%). Four patterns were predominant, representing about ¾ of all cases with any resistance (S: 814 [3.1%]; H: 768 [2.9%]; HS: 552 [2.1%]; Z: 412 [1.6%]). High proportions of S and H resistances were found among both German and foreign-born populations, especially those born in Eastern Europe, and were unexpectedly high among children (H: 4.3%; S: 4.6%). Foreign-born cases had significantly higher proportion of any resistance (16.0%) and MDR-TB (3.3%) compared to German-born cases (8.3% and 0.6%). Of 556 MDR-TB cases, 39.2% showed complete HRZES resistance. Logistic regression revealed having prior TB and being foreign-born as consistently strong risk factors for any DR, MDR-TB, and complete HRZES resistance.

conclusionsDR patterns observed in Germany, particularly for MDR-TB were more complex than expected, highlighting the fact that detailed drug-testing results are crucial before incorporating HRZES drugs in MDR-TB treatment. Furthermore, the relatively high rate of H-resistance in Germany provides strong rationale against the use of only H-based preventive therapy for LTBI.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsChildChild, PreschoolEmigrants and ImmigrantsEthambutolFemaleGermanyHumansInfantIsoniazidLogistic ModelsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAntitubercular AgentsEthambutolIsoniazidPyrazinamideRifampinStreptomycin

Identifiers

PMID31188848
PMCPMC6561568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.