Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31188846›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Improvement of left ventricular function assessment by global longitudinal strain after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.

Misato Chimura, Shinichiro Yamada, Yoshinori Yasaka, Hiroya Kawai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Misato ChimuraHimeji Cardiovascular Center, Himeji, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3674-9171
Shinichiro YamadaHimeji Cardiovascular Center, Himeji, Japan.
Yoshinori YasakaHimeji Cardiovascular Center, Himeji, Japan.
Hiroya KawaiHimeji Cardiovascular Center, Himeji, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit of revascularization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is controversial. On the other hand, left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a more sensitive marker of LV myocardial ischemia and LV function than LV ejection fraction (EF). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of revascularization of CTO on LV function using LV GLS. A total of 70 consecutive patients (65.1±8.9 years, 59 males, LVEF 51.0±12.0%) with CTO who had a positive functional ischemia and underwent PCI, were included in this study. Echocardiography was performed before and 9 months after the procedure with conventional assessment including LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (LVEDV, LVESV), LVEF, and with 2DSTE analysis of GLS. Successful PCI was obtained in 60 patients (86%). There were no stent thromboses during follow-up. GLS showed a significant improvement 9 months after successful PCI (pre-PCI -12.4±4.1% vs. post-PCI -14.5±4.1%, P< 0.01), whereas in failed PCI group that did not change significantly (pre-PCI -13.2±4.2% vs. post-PCI -14.0±4.7%, P = 0.64). LVEF, LVEDV and LVESV did not change significantly during follow-up in both successful and failed groups. Successful PCI for CTO improved LV function, assessed by LV GLS.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary OcclusionEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID31188846
PMCPMC6561546
OpenAlexW1977637730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.