Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31188840›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Seasonal variation of pollen collected by honey bees (Apis mellifera) in developed areas across four regions in the United States.

Pierre Lau, Vaughn Bryant, James D Ellis, Zachary Y Huang, Joseph Sullivan, Daniel R Schmehl, Ana R Cabrera, Juliana Rangel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Where Does Honey Bee (Insects · 2022
    Article
  12. Behavioural regulation of mineral salt intake in honeybees: a self-selection approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Japanese Honeybees (Insects · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pierre LauDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.
Vaughn BryantDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.
James D EllisEntomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Zachary Y HuangDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Joseph SullivanArdea Consulting, Woodland, California, United States of America.
Daniel R SchmehlEntomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Ana R CabreraBayer CropScience LP, Crop Science Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Juliana RangelDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0586-9245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For honey bees (Apis mellifera), colony maintenance and growth are highly dependent on worker foragers obtaining sufficient resources from flowering plants year round. Despite the importance of floral diversity for proper bee nutrition, urban development has drastically altered resource availability and diversity for these important pollinators. Therefore, understanding the floral resources foraged by bees in urbanized areas is key to identifying and promoting plants that enhance colony health in those environments. In this study, we identified the pollen foraged by bees in four developed areas of the U.S., and explored whether there were spatial or temporal differences in the types of floral sources of pollen used by honey bees in these landscapes. To do this, pollen was collected every month for up to one year from colonies located in developed (urban and suburban) sites in California, Texas, Florida, and Michigan, except during months of pollen dearth or winter. Homogenized pollen samples were acetolyzed and identified microscopically to the lowest taxonomic level possible. Once identified, each pollen type was classified into a frequency category based on its overall relative abundance. Species richness and diversity indices were also calculated and compared across states and seasons. We identified up to 64 pollen types belonging to 39 plant families in one season (California). Species richness was highest in CA and lowest in TX, and was highest during spring in every state. In particular, "predominant" and "secondary" pollen types belonged to the families Arecaceae, Sapindaceae, Anacardiaceae, Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Lythraceae, Myrtaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rosaceae, Rutaceae, Saliaceae, and Ulmaceae. This study will help broaden our understanding of honey bee foraging ecology and nutrition in urban environments, and will help promote the use of plants that serve the dual purpose of providing aesthetic value and nutritious forage for honey bee colonies placed in developed landscapes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesCaliforniaClimateEcologyFloridaFlowersMichiganPlantsPollenPollinationSeasonsTexasUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31188840
PMCPMC6561680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.