Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31188830›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Genomic variation predicts adaptive evolutionary responses better than population bottleneck history.

Michael Ørsted, Ary Anthony Hoffmann, Elsa Sverrisdóttir, Kåre Lehmann Nielsen, Torsten Nygaard Kristensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating inbreeding and assessing the risk of outbreeding depression in genetic rescue using whole-genome sequence data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Octopamine receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael ØrstedDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej, Aalborg E, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8222-8399
Ary Anthony HoffmannDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej, Aalborg E, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9497-7645
Elsa SverrisdóttirDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej, Aalborg E, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-7912
Kåre Lehmann NielsenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej, Aalborg E, Denmark.
Torsten Nygaard KristensenDepartment of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej, Aalborg E, Denmark.
Aalborg University · DKThe University of Melbourne · AUAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between population size, inbreeding, loss of genetic variation and evolutionary potential of fitness traits is still unresolved, and large-scale empirical studies testing theoretical expectations are surprisingly scarce. Here we present a highly replicated experimental evolution setup with 120 lines of Drosophila melanogaster having experienced inbreeding caused by low population size for a variable number of generations. Genetic variation in inbred lines and in outbred control lines was assessed by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) of pooled samples consisting of 15 males per line. All lines were reared on a novel stressful medium for 10 generations during which body mass, productivity, and extinctions were scored in each generation. In addition, we investigated egg-to-adult viability in the benign and the stressful environments before and after rearing at the stressful conditions for 10 generations. We found strong positive correlations between levels of genetic variation and evolutionary response in all investigated traits, and showed that genomic variation was more informative in predicting evolutionary responses than population history reflected by expected inbreeding levels. We also found that lines with lower genetic diversity were at greater risk of extinction. For viability, the results suggested a trade-off in the costs of adapting to the stressful environments when tested in a benign environment. This work presents convincing support for long-standing evolutionary theory, and it provides novel insights into the association between genetic variation and evolutionary capacity in a gradient of diversity rather than dichotomous inbred/outbred groups.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenotypeInbreedingAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic VariationGenomicsMalePhenotypePopulation DensitySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID31188830
PMCPMC6590832
OpenAlexW2952975382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.