ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2019
Chemotherapy, Radiation, or Combination Therapy for Stage III Uterine Cancer.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Notch signaling in female cancers: a multifaceted node to overcome drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the outcomes of women with stage III uterine cancer treated with chemotherapy alone, external beam radiation alone, and combination chemotherapy and radiation.
methodsThe National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage III endometrioid, serous, and clear cell uterine cancer treated with either chemotherapy (with or without vaginal brachytherapy) alone, external beam radiation (with or without brachytherapy), or combination chemotherapy and external beam radiation (with or without vaginal brachytherapy) from 2004 to 2015. Survival was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted survival curves after propensity score analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the clinical and demographic characteristics between the cohorts.
resultsOf the 20,873 patients identified, 9,456 (45.3%) received chemotherapy alone, 2,417 (11.6%) were treated with radiation alone, and 9,000 (43.1%) received chemotherapy in combination with external beam radiation. Use of combination therapy was 33.0% in 2004, and then rose to 50.5% in 2015. The mortality of the cohort was 33.1% and median survival was 115 months. Within the cohort, combination therapy was associated with a 23% reduction in mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.80) compared with chemotherapy alone. Similar findings of decreased mortality were noted in subgroup analyses for both stage IIIA (HR=0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.98) and stage IIIC (HR=0.79; 95% CI 0.75-0.84) tumors. Similarly, when compared with radiation alone, combination therapy was accompanied by a 19% decrease in mortality (HR=0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.89). Combination chemoradiation was associated with decreased mortality across all of the histologic subtypes.
conclusionAmong women with stage III uterine cancer, combination chemotherapy and external beam radiation is associated with decreased mortality compared with chemotherapy or radiation alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.