Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31188229›Full record

Trial reportJournal of glaucoma2019

Effects of Brimonidine and Timolol on the Progression of Visual Field Defects in Open-angle Glaucoma: A Single-center Randomized Trial.

Yu Yokoyama, Ryo Kawasaki, Hidetoshi Takahashi, Shigeto Maekawa, Satoru Tsuda, Kazuko Omodaka, Toru Nakazawa

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of glaucoma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu YokoyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Hospital.
Ryo KawasakiDepartment of Public Health, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata.
Hidetoshi TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Hospital.
Shigeto MaekawaDepartments of Ophthalmology.
Satoru TsudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Hospital.
Kazuko OmodakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Hospital.
Toru NakazawaDepartments of Ophthalmology.
Tohoku University Hospital · JPOphthalmology Associates (United States) · USOsaka University · JPTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PRéCIS:: Instillation of brimonidine or timolol slowed visual field deterioration in patients with open-angle glaucoma; both brimonidine and timolol might improve the mean deviation (MD) slopes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of 0.1% brimonidine and 0.5% timolol on the progressing visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe evaluated 1 eye each of 68 glaucoma patients who were treated with at least 1 prostaglandin analog. Their baseline MD slopes were < -0.5 dB/y based on at least 5 Humphrey field analyzer measurements within 3 years. Eligible eyes were randomly assigned to brimonidine or timolol treatment groups and treatments were administered without the wash-out period. Clinical examinations were performed every 4 months for 2 years. We designated the MD slope as the primary endpoint.

resultsUltimately, 56 eyes (brimonidine:timolol=26:30) were included in the present study (mean age=65.2 y). Dropout rates of brimonidine and timolol treatment groups were 27.8% and 6.3%, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline intraocular pressure or MD slopes between brimonidine and timolol groups (12.7 and 12.9 mm Hg, P=0.77, and -1.22 and -1.08 dB/y, P=0.43, respectively). Intraocular pressure decreased significantly in the brimonidine group at 4, 8, 12, and 16 months, and in the timolol group at 4 months, without significant differences between the drugs (P=0.20). MD slopes significantly improved in both groups (brimonidine: -0.38 dB/y, P<0.001; timolol: -0.52 dB/y, P=0.04). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between groups in the primary endpoint (P=0.59).

conclusionBrimonidine and timolol treatments improved MD slopes in open-angle glaucoma.

Indexed as

AgedAntihypertensive AgentsBrimonidine TartrateDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTimololTonometry, OcularVision DisordersVisual FieldsAntihypertensive AgentsBrimonidine TartrateTimolol

Identifiers

PMID31188229
PMCPMC7055936
OpenAlexW2952450462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.