Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31187288›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2019

Real-Time Remote-Health Monitoring Systems: a Review on Patients Prioritisation for Multiple-Chronic Diseases, Taxonomy Analysis, Concerns and Solution Procedure.

K I Mohammed, A A Zaidan, B B Zaidan, O S Albahri, M A Alsalem, A S Albahri, Ali Hadi, M Hashim

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K I MohammedDepartment of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.
A A ZaidanDepartment of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia. aws.alaa@gmail.com.
B B ZaidanDepartment of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.
O S AlbahriDepartment of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.
M A AlsalemCollege of Administration and Economic, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
A S AlbahriCollege of Engineering, University of Information Technology and Communications, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali HadiPresidency of Ministries, Establishment of Martyrs, Baghdad, Iraq.
M HashimDepartment of Computing, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia.

Funding

UPSI FRGS/2016-0066-109-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remotely monitoring a patient's condition is a serious issue and must be addressed. Remote health monitoring systems (RHMS) in telemedicine refers to resources, strategies, methods and installations that enable doctors or other medical professionals to work remotely to consult, diagnose and treat patients. The goal of RHMS is to provide timely medical services at remote areas through telecommunication technologies. Through major advancements in technology, particularly in wireless networking, cloud computing and data storage, RHMS is becoming a feasible aspect of modern medicine. RHMS for the prioritisation of patients with multiple chronic diseases (MCDs) plays an important role in sustainably providing high-quality healthcare services. Further investigations are required to highlight the limitations of the prioritisation of patients with MCDs over a telemedicine environment. This study introduces a comprehensive and inclusive review on the prioritisation of patients with MCDs in telemedicine applications. Furthermore, it presents the challenges and open issues regarding patient prioritisation in telemedicine. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) The limitations and problems of existing patients' prioritisation with MCDs are presented and emphasised. (2) Based on the analysis of the academic literature, an accurate solution for remote prioritisation in a large scale of patients with MCDs was not presented. (3) There is an essential need to produce a new multiple-criteria decision-making theory to address the current problems in the prioritisation of patients with MCDs.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseComorbidityMonitoring, PhysiologicWireless TechnologyHumansTelemedicineChronic diseaseHealthcare servicesMultiple chronic diseasesPriorityRemote health monitoring systemSensorTriage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.