Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31187232›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2019

Robotic transanal minimally invasive rectal mucosa harvest.

Katherine N Howard, Lee C Zhao, Aaron C Weinberg, Michael Granieri, Mitchell A Bernstein, Alexis L Grucela

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine N HowardNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3991-0955
Lee C ZhaoDepartment of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Aaron C WeinbergDepartment of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Michael GranieriDepartment of Urology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Mitchell A BernsteinDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, 530 1st Ave. Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Alexis L GrucelaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, 530 1st Ave. Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Alexis.Grucela@nyulangone.org.
NYU Langone Health · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBuccal mucosal grafts (BMG) are traditionally used in urethral reconstruction. There may be insufficient BMG for applications requiring large grafts, such as urethral stricture after gender-affirming phalloplasty. Rectal mucosa in lieu of BMG avoids oral impairment, while potentially affording less postoperative pain and larger graft dimensions. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) using laparoscopic instruments has been described. Due to technical challenges of harvesting a sizable graft within the rectal lumen, we adopted a new robotic approach. We demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a novel technique of Robotic TAMIS (R-TAMIS) in the harvest of rectal mucosa for the purpose of onlay graft urethroplasty.

methodsSix patients (ages 28-60) presenting with urethral stricture and one vaginal stricture underwent robotic rectal mucosal harvest. The procedure, which was first studied on an inanimate bovine colon model, was performed under general anesthesia in lithotomy position using the GelPOINT

resultsThere were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Mean graft size was 11.4 × 3.0 cm. All reconstructions had excellent graft take. All patients recovered without morbidity or mortality. They reported minimal postoperative pain and all regained bowel function on postoperative day one. Patients with prior BMG harvests subjectively self-reported less postoperative pain and greater quality of life. There have been no long-term complications at a median follow-up of 17 months.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first use of R-TAMIS for rectal mucosa harvest. Our preliminary series indicates this approach is feasible and safe, constituting a promising minimally invasive technique for urethral reconstruction. Prospective studies evaluating graft outcomes and donor site morbidity with more long-term follow-up are needed.

Indexed as

AdultEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresProspective StudiesRectumRobotic Surgical ProceduresTissue and Organ HarvestingTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryUrethral StrictureRectal mucosaRobotic surgeryTAMISTransanal surgeryTransgender surgeryUrethroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31187232
OpenAlexW2952890977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.