Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31187219›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2019

Hiatal hernias in patients with GERD-like symptoms: evaluation of dynamic real-time MRI vs endoscopy.

Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Johannes Uhlig, Ulrike Streit, Annemarie Uhlig, Thilo Sprenger, Edris Wedi, Volker Ellenrieder, Michael Ghadimi, Martin Uecker, Dirk Voit and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic value of real-time dynamic gastric contrast ultrasound for hiatal hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ali Seif Amir HosseiniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. ali.seif@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-8867
Johannes UhligDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Ulrike StreitDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Annemarie UhligDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Thilo SprengerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Edris WediDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Volker EllenriederDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael GhadimiDepartment of General, Visceral, and Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Martin UeckerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Dirk VoitBiomedical NMR, Max-Planck-Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens FrahmDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Göttingen, Germany.
Joachim LotzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Lorenz BiggemannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the diagnostic potential of real-time MRI for assessment of hiatal hernias in patients with GERD-like symptoms compared to endoscopy. MATERIAL AND

methodsOne hundred eight patients with GERD-like symptoms were included in this observational cohort study between 2015 and 2017. Real-time MRI was performed at 3.0 Tesla with temporal resolution of 40 ms, dynamically visualizing the esophageal transport of a pineapple juice bolus, its passage through the gastroesophageal junction, and functional responses during Valsalva maneuver. Hernia detection on MRI and endoscopy was calculated using contingency tables with diagnosis of hernia on either modality as reference.

resultsOf 108 patients, 107 underwent successful MRI without adverse events; 1 examination was aborted to inability to swallow pineapple juice in supine position. No perforation or acute bleeding occurred during endoscopy. Median examination time was 15 min. Eighty-five patients (79.4%) were diagnosed with hiatal hernia on either real-time MRI or endoscopy. Forty-six hernias were visible on both modalities. Seventeen hernias were evident exclusively on MRI, and 22 exclusively on endoscopy. Sixteen of the 63 MRI-detected hernias (25.4%) were detectable only during Valsalva maneuver, which were smaller compared to hernias at rest (median - 13.5 vs - 33.0 mm, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy for hernia detection was comparable for MRI and endoscopy (sensitivity 74% vs 80%, p = 0.4223; specificity 100% vs 100%, p > 0.99).

conclusionReal-time MRI is a fast and safe modality for assessment of the gastroesophageal junction, without radiation exposure or administration of gadolinium-based contrast media. Although MRI and endoscopy yield comparable diagnostic accuracy, dynamic MRI sequences are able to visualize hiatal hernias that were occult on static MRI sequences or endoscopy in a relevant number of cases. KEY POINTS: • Real-time MRI is a safe and fast imaging modality for examination of the gastroesophageal junction, combining anatomical and functional information for enhanced detection of hiatal hernias. • Real-time MRI and endoscopy yield comparably high diagnostic accuracy: real-time MRI visualizes hiatal hernias that were occult on endoscopy in a relevant number of patients; however, several hiatal hernias detected on endoscopy were occult on real-time MRI. • There is clinical potential of real-time MR imaging in patients with GERD-like symptoms and equivocal findings on endoscopy or pH-metry, for anatomical visualization in patients planned for surgical intervention, or those with suspected fundoplication failures.

Indexed as

AgedEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHernia, HiatalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedValsalva ManeuverEDGEndoscopyGastroesophageal reflux diseaseHiatal herniaMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID31187219
OpenAlexW2949859574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.