Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31187196›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatological research2019

Monocytes co-cultured with reconstructed keloid and normal skin models skew towards M2 macrophage phenotype.

Grace C Limandjaja, Taco Waaijman, Sanne Roffel, Frank B Niessen, Susan Gibbs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Viewing keloids within the immune microenvironment.American journal of translational research · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [Tumor characteristics of keloid].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Grace C LimandjajaDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, O|2 Lab Building Room 11E05, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, De Boelelaan, 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Taco WaaijmanDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, O|2 Lab Building Room 11E05, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, De Boelelaan, 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sanne RoffelDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, O|2 Lab Building Room 11E05, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, De Boelelaan, 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank B NiessenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan GibbsDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, O|2 Lab Building Room 11E05, Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, De Boelelaan, 1108, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.gibbs@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3446-6138
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Rijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland INT102010.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several abnormalities have been reported in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of keloid-forming patients and particularly in the monocyte cell fraction. The goal of this in vitro study was to determine whether monocytes from keloid-prone patients contribute to the keloid phenotype in early developing keloids, and whether monocyte differentiation is affected by the keloid microenvironment. Therefore, keloid-derived keratinocytes and fibroblasts were used to reconstruct a full thickness, human, in vitro keloid scar model. The reconstructed keloid was co-cultured with monocytes from keloid-forming patients and compared to reconstructed normal skin co-cultured with monocytes from non-keloid-formers. The reconstructed keloid showed increased contraction, dermal thickness (trend) and α-SMA+ staining, but co-culture with monocytes did not further enhance the keloid phenotype. After 2-week culture, all monocytes switched from a CD11c

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdultCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesFemaleFibroblastsHumansKeloidKeratinocytesMacrophagesMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesPrimary Cell CultureSkinYoung AdultCo-cultureImmune cellsIn vitro modelKeloidM2 macrophagesMonocytesOrganotypicPBMC

Identifiers

PMID31187196
PMCPMC6736899
OpenAlexW2950072972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.