Observational studyHerz2020
Prognosis of patients with previous myocardial infarction, coronary slow flow, and normal coronary angiogram.
Observational study in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Predicting Coronary Slow Flow Phenomena.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Coronary Slow-Flow Syndrome: A Review on Natural History of Disease and Best Practices.Research in heart yield and translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a common assumption that patients with coronary slow flow (CSF) have an excellent prognosis in the absence of coronary artery stenoses. Little is known about whether a history of previous coronary events affects the long-term survival in this population. In this retrospective, observational study, we assessed the possible association of a previous coronary event and long-term prognosis in patients with CSF but without significant coronary artery stenoses.
methodsA total of 141 patients (70 male; median age: 59 years, range: 33-78 years) with CSF and normal coronary angiograms were included in the study. Patients were followed up for all-cause mortality during a period of 47 ± 22 months.
resultsPrevious myocardial infarction (MI) was reported by 16 (11%) patients who had similar left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as those without previous MI (51 ± 16 vs. 53 ± 16%, p = 0.595). Patients with previous MI more often had an abnormal resting electrocardiogram (69 vs. 40%, p = 0.03), while there were no significant differences in other baseline clinical characteristics (p > 0.05 for age, gender, risk factors, pharmacological treatment). In univariate Cox analysis, only previous MI was associated with unfavorable long-term survival (log-rank p = 0.012), while an abnormal electrocardiogram, LVEF, and other clinical variables were not (log-rank p > 0.05, for all). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed unfavorable long-term survival in patients with CSF and a history of previous MI.
conclusionIn patients with CSF and an otherwise normal coronary angiogram, a history of a previous MI is associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31187194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.