SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2019
Platelet-Rich Plasma for Treating Androgenic Alopecia: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2023Pooled it
- Is autologous platelet-rich plasma capable of increasing hair density in patients with androgenic alopecia? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaPooled it
- Platelet-rich Plasma for Androgenetic Alopecia Treatment: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Pilot Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020Trial
- Photothermal Biomodulated Platelet-rich Plasma Improves Preservation of Hair Grafts and Extends Their Viability.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma for Treating Androgenic Alopecia: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Current Progress of Platelet-Rich Derivatives in Cartilage and Joint Repairs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Integrative and Mechanistic Approach to the Hair Growth Cycle and Hair Loss.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Platelet Rich Plasma and Its Use in Hair Regrowth: A Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
- Undiagnosed cicatricial alopecia among new patients undergoing platelet-rich plasma.JAAD international · 2021Article
- Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma versus Saline Solution as a Preservation Solution for Hair Transplantation.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Hair Transplant Practice Guidelines.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgeryArticle
- Meta-analysis on the Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma in Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia.International journal of trichologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains a variety of growth factors and proteins that can accelerate tissue repair. Androgenic alopecia is a genetic disorder characterized by atrophy of hair follicles and hair loss. At present, PRP injections for hair restoration have become a popular though controversial practice. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the differences between patients treated with local injections of PRP and control group subjects to explore the effectiveness of PRP treatment for androgenic alopecia. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library until Jan 2019 for human studies evaluating the efficacy of PRP for the treatment of androgenic alopecia.
resultsWe retrieved 132 papers; 11 articles matched our inclusion criteria and comprised 262 androgenic alopecia patients. Through a meta-analysis, we found a significantly locally increased hair number per cm
conclusionMost studies suggest that subcutaneous injection of PRP is likely to reduce hair loss, increase hair diameter and density in patients with androgenic alopecia. Because of the low quality of the studies, small sample sizes, different treatment regimens and possible publication bias, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, more randomized controlled studies should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.