ArticleHNO2019
[Speech fluency disorders in childhood and adolescence].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent speech fluency disorders, mostly stuttering and less frequently cluttering, occur in approximately 1% of children and adolescents. They considerably impair the social participation and quality of life of those affected. The German interdisciplinary evidence-based S3 guidelines provide information about the pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of speech fluency disorders and contain a systematic review on the efficacy of stuttering treatment. For preschool children the Lidcombe therapy shows the best evidence of efficacy. Strong evidence also exists for an indirect approach. For adolescents and recently for children aged 6‑12 years old there is a high level of evidence for speech restructuring methods, such as fluency shaping. There is weak evidence for stuttering modification procedures and for combined speech restructuring and stuttering modification approaches. Negative evidence exists for the eclectic, unspecified stuttering therapies, breathing regulation, and hypnosis, which are frequently applied in Germany. An early start of treatment is decisive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31187151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.