Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31186728›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Prognostic impact of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein on patients with breast cancer.

Tatsuo Shimura, Masahiko Shibata, Kenji Gonda, Yuko Murakami, Masaru Noda, Kazunoshin Tachibana, Noriko Abe, Tohru Ohtake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Connects Inflammation to Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tatsuo ShimuraDepartment of Progressive DOHaD Research, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Masahiko ShibataDepartment of Advanced Cancer Immunotherapy, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Kenji GondaClinical Oncology Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Yuko MurakamiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Masaru NodaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Kazunoshin TachibanaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Noriko AbeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.
Tohru OhtakeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic impacts of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6 expression levels in patients with breast cancer remain controversial. A total of 55 female patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled, and preoperative prognostic parameters including IL-6 and CRP were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and candidates' prognostic factors were examined using a Cox proportional hazard model. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, IL-6 at 10.0 pg/ml and CRP at 0.12 mg/dl were determined as threshold values to predict OS and RFS, respectively. Patients with IL-6 ≥10.0 pg/ml had poorer OS compared with those with IL-6 <10.0 pg/ml (P=0.003), and patients with CRP ≥0.12 mg/dl had poorer RFS compared with those with CRP <0.12 mg/dl (P<0.001). Serum IL-6 level (hazard ratio, 13.230; 95% confidence interval, 1.285-136.214; P=0.030) and triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio, 11.739; 95% confidence interval, 1.415-97.362; P=0.023) were independent prognostic factors for OS, and CRP expression level was an independent prognostic factor for RFS in patients with breast cancer (hazard ratio, 18.571; 95% confidence interval, 2.240-153.949; P=0.007). In patients with invasive breast cancer, preoperative serum IL-6 and triple-negative subtype may be independent prognostic factors for OS, while for RFS, preoperative CRP may be a more accurate prognostic factor compared with those currently established.

Indexed as

breast cancerCRPIL-6OSRFS

Identifiers

PMID31186728
PMCPMC6507489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.