ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2019
Slow torque recovery after eccentric exercise and the repeated bout effect; the role of primary and secondary muscle damage.
Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-free DNA kinetics in response to muscle-damaging exercise: A drop jump study.Experimental physiology · 2024Article
- The Contralateral Repeated Bout Effect of Elbow Flexors Is Not Observed in Young Women Following Mild Muscle Damage from Eccentric Exercises.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Increasing the resting time between drop jumps lessens delayed-onset muscle soreness and limits the extent of prolonged low-frequency force depression in human knee extensor muscles.European journal of applied physiology · 2022Article
- Response of Knee Extensor Muscle-Tendon Unit Stiffness to Unaccustomed and Repeated High-Volume Eccentric Exercise.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the role of primary and secondary damage in the variation between people of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) torque recovery following eccentric exercise and the faster recovery following a repeated bout of exercise.
methodsTwenty-one healthy, active but untrained young female subjects undertook eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors and 11 repeated the exercise 28 days later. Changes of MVC torque and creatine kinase (CK) were followed for 7 days after each bout of exercise.
resultsFollowing the first bout, 45% of subjects showed a continuing decline in MVC torque, suggesting secondary damage, which was correlated with a large delayed CK release (R
conclusionsThe data are consistent with primary damage being similar between subjects and unaffected by the repeated bout while it is secondary damage which accounts for differences in MVC torque recovery and is suppressed following a repeated bout of exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31186391PMC6587094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.