Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31186260›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2019

Design and Outcomes of a Community Trial to Increase Pap Testing in Pacific Islander Women.

Sora Park Tanjasiri, Michele Mouttapa, Lola Sablan-Santos, Jie W Weiss, Alisa Chavarria, Jasmine DeGuzman Lacsamana, Vanessa Tuiòne May, Lourdes Quitugua, Marina Tupua, Dorothy Schmidt-Vaivao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sora Park TanjasiriDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine. tanjasir@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8829-9363
Michele MouttapaDepartment of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton.
Lola Sablan-SantosGuam Communications Network, Inc., Long Beach, California.
Jie W WeissDepartment of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton.
Alisa ChavarriaGuam Communications Network, Inc., Long Beach, California.
Jasmine DeGuzman LacsamanaArchstone Foundation, Long Beach, California.
Vanessa Tuiòne MayTongan Community Service Center/Special Service for Groups, Inc., Los Angeles, California.
Lourdes QuituguaGuam Communications Network, Inc., Long Beach, California.
Marina TupuaSamoan National Nurses Association, Long Beach, California.
Dorothy Schmidt-VaivaoSamoan National Nurses Association, Long Beach, California.
Guam Communications Network · USAmerican Nurses Association · USCalifornia State University, Fullerton · USArchstone Foundation · USSpecial Service for Groups · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

A Pap Test Intervention to Enhance Decision Making among Pacific Islander WomenR01CA149324 · NCI · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON · PI SANTOS, LOLA SABLAN, TANJASIRI, SORA P · 2010 to 2014
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPap tests remain an essential cervical cancer detection method in the United States, yet they are underutilized among Pacific Islanders (PI) who experience elevated cervical cancer incidence and mortality. This study describes the design, methods, participants, and outcomes of a multiyear (2010-2016), community-based randomized intervention trial in southern California. Based upon strong collectivistic norms, the trial tested the efficacy of a unique social support intervention targeting Chamorro, Samoan, and Tongan women and their male husbands/partners.

methodsA single-session educational intervention was designed and tailored for ethnic- and gender-specific groups to increase men's social support for their female wives/partners to receive a Pap test, and for women to receive a Pap test. The comparison group received preexisting brochures on Pap testing (for women) or general men's health (for men). Pretest and 6-month follow-up data were analyzed.

resultsIntervention and comparison groups were mostly equivalent on pretest demographics and outcome variables. Intervention women who were not compliant with Pap screening recommendations at pretest were significantly more likely to have scheduled and received a Pap test at 6-month follow-up. However, 6-month follow-up results indicated no intervention effect on changes in women's Pap testing knowledge, fatalistic attitudes, or perceived social support from their male partner.

conclusionsEthnic- and gender-tailored community interventions can successfully increase Pap test behaviors for PI women, although more research is needed on the specific pathways leading to behavior change. IMPACT: Collaborative community-based interventions lead to increases in women's cancer prevention and early detection for Pacific Islander and other collectivistic communities.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapanicolaou TestVaginal SmearsAdultAgedCaliforniaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedNative Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31186260
PMCPMC12626035
OpenAlexW2950387656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.