Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31186071›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Naloxone interventions in opioid overdoses: a systematic review protocol.

Lindsay Victoria Shaw, Jessica Moe, Roy Purssell, Jane A Buxton, Jesse Godwin, Mary M Doyle-Waters, Penelope M A Brasher, Jeffrey P Hau, Jason Curran, Corinne M Hohl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Wearable Device Towards Automatic Detection and Treatment of Opioid Overdose.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay Victoria ShawSchool of Social Dimensions of Health, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Jessica MoeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. jessica.moe@ubc.ca.
Roy PurssellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jesse GodwinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Mary M Doyle-WatersCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Penelope M A BrasherCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jeffrey P HauDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Jason CurranBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Corinne M HohlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Centre for Disease Control · CAVancouver Coastal Health Research Institute · CAUniversity of Victoria · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR 397977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNorth America is in the midst of an unabated opioid overdose epidemic due to the increasing non-medical use of fentanyl and ultra-potent opioids. Naloxone is an effective antidote to opioid toxicity, yet its optimal dosing in the context of fentanyl and ultra-potent opioid overdoses remains unknown. This review aims to determine the relationship between the first empiric dose of naloxone and reversal of toxicity, adverse events, and the total cumulative dose required among patients with undifferentiated opioid overdoses and those with suspected toxicity from ultra-potent opioids. Secondary objectives include evaluating the relationship between the cumulative naloxone dose and toxicity reversal and adverse events, among patients with undifferentiated opioid overdoses and those with suspected toxicity from ultra-potent opioids.

methodsTo identify studies, we will search MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, DARE, CDAG, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, multiple trial registries, and the gray literature. Included studies will evaluate patients with suspected or confirmed opioid toxicity from undifferentiated opioids and ultra-potent opioids, who received an empiric and possibly additional doses of naloxone. The main outcomes of interest are the relationship between naloxone dose and toxicity reversal and adverse events. We will include controlled and non-controlled interventional studies, observational studies, case reports/series, and reports from poison control centers. We will extract data and assess study quality in duplicate with discrepancies resolved by consensus or a third party. We will use the Downs and Black and Cochrane risk of bias tools for observational and randomized controlled studies. If we find sufficient variation in dose, we will fit a random effects one-stage model to estimate a dose-response relationship. We will conduct multiple subgroup analyses, including by type of opioid used and by suspected high and low prevalence of ultra-potent opioid use based on geographic location and time of the original studies. DISCUSSION: Our review will include the most up-to-date available data including ultra-potent opioids to inform the current response to the opioid epidemic, addressing the limitations of recent reviews. We anticipate limitations relating to study heterogeneity. We will disseminate study results widely to update overdose treatment guidelines and naloxone dosing in Take Home Naloxone programs.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsSystematic Reviews as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAdministration and dosageAdverse effectsDrug administration scheduleDrug dosage calculationsDrug overdoseFentanylNaloxoneProtocolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31186071
PMCPMC6560883
OpenAlexW2952548158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.