Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31186028›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women's healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation - EVERYWOMAN.

Erika Cottrell, Blair G Darney, Miguel Marino, Anna Rose Templeton, Lorie Jacob, Megan Hoopes, Maria Rodriguez, Brigit Hatch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erika CottrellOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, United States of America.
Blair G DarneyOregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Miguel MarinoOregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Anna Rose TempletonOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, United States of America. templetona@ochin.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-5952
Lorie JacobOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, United States of America.
Megan HoopesOCHIN, Inc, 1881 SW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, United States of America.
Maria RodriguezOregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.
Brigit HatchOregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.

Funding

Reproductive care in the safety net: Women's health after Affordable Care Act implementation (EVERYWOMAN)R01HS025155 · AHRQ · OCHIN, INC. · PI COTTRELL, ERIKA K. BARTH · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 1R01HS025155-01AHRQ HHS R01 HS025155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based reproductive care reduces morbidity and mortality for women and their children, decreases health disparities and saves money. Community health centres (CHCs) are a key point of access to reproductive and primary care services for women who are publicly insured, uninsured or unable to pay for care. Women of reproductive age (15-44 years) comprise just of a quarter (26%) of the total CHC patient population, with higher than average proportions of women of colour, women with lower income and educational status and social challenges (e.g. housing). Such factors are associated with poorer reproductive health outcomes across contraceptive, preventive and pregnancy-related services. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) prioritised reproductive health as an essential component of women's preventive services to counter these barriers and increase women's access to care. In 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled ACA implementation through Medicaid expansion as optional, creating a natural experiment to measure the ACA's impact on women's reproductive care delivery and health outcomes.

methodsThis paper describes a 5-year, mixed-methods study comparing women's contraceptive, preventive, prenatal and postpartum care before and after ACA implementation and between Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states. Quantitative assessment will leverage electronic health record data from the ADVANCE Clinical Research Network, a network of over 130 CHCs in 24 states, to describe care and identify patient, practice and state-level factors associated with provision of recommended evidence-based care. Qualitative assessment will include patient, provider and practice level interviews to understand perceptions and utilisation of reproductive healthcare in CHC settings. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first study using patient level electronic health record data from multiple states to assess the impact of ACA implementation in conjunction with other practice and policy level factors such as Title X funding or 1115 Medicaid waivers. Findings will be relevant to policy and practice, informing efforts to enhance the provision of timely, evidence-based reproductive care, improve health outcomes and reduce disparities among women. Patient, provider and practice-level interviews will serve to contextualise our findings and develop subsequent studies and interventions to support women's healthcare provision in CHC settings.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersHealth Services AccessibilityMedicaidPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPreventive Health ServicesReproductive HealthReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultCommunity Health ServicesContraceptionElectronic Health RecordsEthnicityFemaleHealth PolicyHealth Status DisparitiesAffordable Care Actcommunity health centrescontraceptive careelectronic health recordspostpartum careprenatal carereproductive healthWomen’s healthwomen’s preventive care

Identifiers

PMID31186028
PMCPMC6558747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.