ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019
"Like a nurse but not a nurse": Clinical Research Practitioners and the evolution of the clinical research delivery workforce in the NHS.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Trial Delivery in Parkinson's Disease: Qualitative Insights from PD STAT.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2022Trial
- Exploring the role and responsibilities, motivations, and career aspirations of clinical research nurses: a qualitative study.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- An ideal portrait of the professional competence of clinical research nurses: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of emergency medical systems in the UK and Japan: recommendations for Japan based on on-site observations in the UK.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Research Practitioner: Transformation to a Competent Professional Through Reflective Practice.Nursing & health sciences · 2024Review
- Significance and structure of clinical research in the UK: an introduction for gastroenterology and hepatology nurses.Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Review
- The organization and impacts of clinical research delivery workforce redeployment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative case study of one research-intensive acute hospital trust.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Recognising a watershed moment: opportunities for clinical research nursing and midwifery.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2022Article
- Multi-professional perceptions of clinical research delivery and the Clinical Research Nurse role: a realist review.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2022Article
- Boundary spanning and identity work in the clinical research delivery workforce: a qualitative study of research nurses, midwives and allied health professionals in the National Health Service, United Kingdom.Health research policy and systems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical research is increasing across the United Kingdom. Within the context of a shortage of nurses, trusts have struggled to maintain research capacity. In order to meet staffing demands, trusts have increasingly turned to Clinical Research Practitioners (CRPs) to assist in the delivery of clinical research. Initially an ad hoc workforce, the CRP role is being formalised and professionalised. This study is a close examination of the clinical research delivery workforce at one research-intensive acute trust in the United Kingdom, with a focus on the emerging CRP staff group.
methodsThe study was conducted in a large inner-city teaching hospital (acute trust) in London, United Kingdom. Data were collected between September and December 2017. Twenty-five staff were interviewed across 11 different directorates. Interviews were semi-structured with an overall focus on research staff backgrounds and roles, as well as their perceptions and experiences of careers in research. The data were managed using NVivo 11 software and analysed thematically.
resultsCRPs are drawn from a wider pool of educational and employment backgrounds than their nurse colleagues, and actively seek out work in health research. CRPs receive on-the-job training to acquire the competencies that are necessary for them to carry out their work. The CRP role, which began in an ad hoc manner, has become regularised, yet remains to be well defined, which can be a source of frustration for CRPs and those who work with them.
conclusionsThe professionalisation of the CRP workforce represents an opportunity for the health research system to employ research workers who possess a range of in-demand skills and to shore up research capacity in the context of the shortage of nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.