Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31185974›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2019

Testicular epidermoid cysts: a reevaluation.

Petra Anheuser, J Kranz, E Stolle, D Höflmayer, F Büscheck, S Mühlstädt, G Lock, K P Dieckmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Testicular Epidermoid Cyst: A Rare Case Report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Petra AnheuserKlinik für Urologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany. petra.anheuser@web.de.
J KranzKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, St.-Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany.
E StolleInstitut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany.
D HöflmayerInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
F BüscheckInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
S MühlstädtUniversitätsklink und Poliklinik für Urologie, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
G LockKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany.
K P DieckmannKlinik für Urologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany.
Albertinen Diakoniewerk · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DESankt-Antonius-Hospital Eschweiler · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTesticular epidermoid cysts (TECs) are rare benign testicular neoplasms. As TECs are rarely associated with germ cell tumours (GCTs), the understanding of biological behaviour and clinical management of TEC is unresolved.

methodsWe retrospectively searched the files of patients treated for testicular neoplasms and germ cell cancer in the time from 2000 to 2017. Those with TEC were subjected to closer review looking to clinical and histological features, and to results from imaging with ultrasonography (US), contrast enhanced sonography (CEUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

resultsAmong 589 patients undergoing surgery for testicular tumour, nine simple TECs were identified (1.5, 95% confidence intervals 0.53-2.50%). Median age was 26 years. Imaging revealed sharply demarcated roundish lesions with avascular central areas. Eight patients underwent testis-sparing excision with no recurrence ensuing. One had orchiectomy because of large size of the mass. Histologically, TECs consisted of cornifying squamous cell epithelium and no accompanying germ cell neoplasia in situ. Two additional cases (0.3% of all) required orchiectomy because these TECs were associated with ipsilateral GCT.

conclusionsTEC is usually a benign lesion that can safely be diagnosed with US, CEUS and MRI due to its roundish shape and its avascular centre. Histologically, this TEC corresponds to the prepubertal-type teratoma unrelated to germ cell neoplasia in situ of the 2016 WHO classification. The other subtype of TEC that is associated with invasive GCT represents a teratoma of postpubertal-type. From a clinical point of view it could be easier to differentiate between a "simple TEC" which is benign (prepubertal type) and a "complex TEC" which is malignant because of its association with invasive GCT.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildEpidermal CystHumansMaleNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalRetrospective StudiesTesticular NeoplasmsTestisYoung AdultEpidermoid cystGerm cell tumourScrotal sonographyTesticular neoplasmTestis sparing surgery

Identifiers

PMID31185974
PMCPMC6561757
OpenAlexW2952058512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.