ArticleBMC medical research methodology2019
Effective stakeholder engagement: design and implementation of a clinical trial (SWOG S1415CD) to improve cancer care.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Guideline
- Impact of treatment experience on patient knowledge of colony-stimulating factors among patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: evidence from S1415CD-a large pragmatic trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Trial
- Effects of a Guideline-Informed Clinical Decision Support System Intervention to Improve Colony-Stimulating Factor Prescribing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Successes and challenges of implementing a cancer care delivery intervention in community oncology practices: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Stakeholder-engaged process for refining the design of a clinical trial in home hospice.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Trial
- The ACTTION Guide to Clinical Trials of Pain Treatments, part II: mitigating bias, maximizing value.Pain reportsTrial
- Codesigning Communication Interventions With Adolescents, Parents, and Clinicians in Pediatric Oncology: A Feasibility Study.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: enhancing patient and public involvement in dermatology PRO research.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Strategies for recruiting participants underrepresented in clinical research: A scoping review.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Engaging Black Women in Stress Urinary Incontinence Research Prioritization Through Intentional Recruitment and Alliance With Community Partners.Urology practice · 2025Article
- Article
- What methods are currently available for incorporating implementation considerations within the economic evaluation of health technologies? A scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Engaging Cancer Care Physicians in Off-Label Drug Clinical Trials: Human-Centered Design Approach.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Challenges and promising solutions to engaging patients in healthcare implementation in the United States: an environmental scan.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Beyond Participation: Evaluating the Role of Patients in Designing Oncology Clinical Trials.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Evaluating cancer genetic services in a safety net system: overcoming barriers for a lasting impact beyond the CHARM research project.Journal of community genetics · 2023Article
- An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2022Article
- Effective engagement of a stakeholder advisory board in severe mental illness (SMI) research: A case study of a clinical trial to improve adherence among people with SMI and hypertension.International journal of healthcare · 2022Article
- Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has engaged an External Stakeholder Advisory Group (ESAG) in the planning and implementation of the TrACER Study (S1415CD), a five-year pragmatic clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of a guideline-based colony stimulating factor standing order intervention. The trial is being conducted by SWOG through the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program in 45 clinics. The ESAG includes ten patient partners, two payers, two pharmacists, two guideline experts, four providers and one medical ethicist. This manuscript describes the ESAG's role and impact on the trial.
methodsDuring early trial development, the research team assembled the ESAG to inform plans for each phase of the trial. ESAG members provide feedback and engage in problem solving to improve trial implementation. Each year, members participate in one in-person meeting, web conferences and targeted email discussion. Additionally, they complete a survey that assesses their satisfaction with communication and collaboration. The research team collected and reviewed stakeholder input from 2014 to 2018 for impact on the trial.
resultsThe ESAG has informed trial design, implementation and dissemination planning. The group advised the trial's endpoints, regimen list and development of cohort and usual care arms. Based on ESAG input, the research team enhanced patient surveys and added pharmacy-related questions to the component application to assess order entry systems. ESAG patient partners collaborated with the research team to develop a patient brochure and study summary for clinic staff. In addition to identifying recruitment strategies and patient-oriented platforms for publicly sharing results, ESAG members participated as co-authors on this manuscript and a conference poster presentation highlighting stakeholder influence on the trial. The annual satisfaction survey results suggest that ESAG members were satisfied with the methods, frequency and target areas of their engagement in the trial during project years 1-3.
conclusionsDiverse stakeholder engagement has been essential in optimizing the design, implementation and planned dissemination of the TrACER Study. The lessons described in the manuscript may assist others to effectively partner with stakeholders on clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.