Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31185859›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Tool use and social homophily among male bottlenose dolphins.

M R Bizzozzero, S J Allen, L Gerber, S Wild, S L King, R C Connor, W R Friedman, S Wittwer, M Krützen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Training the Concept of Innovate in Dolphins (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Strategic intergroup alliances increase access to a contested resource in male bottlenose dolphins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The ontogeny of social networks in wild great tits (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M R Bizzozzero1 Evolutionary Genetics Groups, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich , 8057 Zurich , Switzerland.
S J Allen1 Evolutionary Genetics Groups, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich , 8057 Zurich , Switzerland.
L Gerber1 Evolutionary Genetics Groups, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich , 8057 Zurich , Switzerland.
S Wild1 Evolutionary Genetics Groups, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich , 8057 Zurich , Switzerland.
S L King2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia , Perth, Western Australia 6009 , Australia.
R C Connor5 Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth , North Dartmouth, MA 02747 , USA.
W R Friedman6 Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA 92093 , USA.
S Wittwer1 Evolutionary Genetics Groups, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich , 8057 Zurich , Switzerland.
M Krützen1 Evolutionary Genetics Groups, Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich , 8057 Zurich , Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homophilous behaviour plays a central role in the formation of human friendships. Individuals form social ties with others that show similar phenotypic traits, independently of relatedness. Evidence of such homophily can be found in bottlenose dolphins ( Tursiops aduncus) in Shark Bay, Western Australia, where females that use marine sponges as foraging tools often associate with other females that use sponges. 'Sponging' is a socially learned, time-consuming behaviour, transmitted from mother to calf. Previous research illustrated a strong female bias in adopting this technique. The lower propensity for males to engage in sponging may be due to its incompatibility with adult male-specific behaviours, particularly the formation of multi-level alliances. However, the link between sponging and male behaviour has never been formally tested. Here, we show that male spongers associated significantly more often with other male spongers irrespective of their level of relatedness. Male spongers spent significantly more time foraging, and less time resting and travelling, than did male non-spongers. Interestingly, we found no difference in time spent socializing. Our study provides novel insights into the relationship between tool use and activity budgets of male dolphins, and indicates social homophily in the second-order alliance composition of tool-using bottlenose dolphins.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorTool Use BehaviorAnimalsBottle-Nosed DolphinFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsSocial Learningactivity budgetalliance formationbottlenose dolphinshomophilysocial networkstool use

Identifiers

PMID31185859
PMCPMC6571475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.