Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31185857›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

The strategic reference gene: an organismal theory of inclusive fitness.

Lutz Fromhage, Michael D Jennions

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How to make an inclusive-fitness model.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Lifetime inclusive fitness effects of cooperative polygamy in the acorn woodpecker.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Biological adaptation in light of the Lewontin-Williams (a)symmetry.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  6. The balance model of honest sexual signaling.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Price equation and the unity of social evolution theory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. What life is for: a commentary on Fromhage and Jennions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lutz Fromhage1 Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä , PO Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä , Finland.
Michael D Jennions2 Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University , Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601 , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How to define and use the concept of inclusive fitness is a contentious topic in evolutionary theory. Inclusive fitness can be used to calculate selection on a focal gene, but it is also applied to whole organisms. Individuals are then predicted to appear designed as if to maximize their inclusive fitness, provided that certain conditions are met (formally when interactions between individuals are 'additive'). Here we argue that applying the concept of inclusive fitness to organisms is justified under far broader conditions than previously shown, but only if it is appropriately defined. Specifically, we propose that organisms should maximize the sum of their offspring ( including any accrued due to the behaviour/phenotype of relatives), plus any effects on their relatives' offspring production, weighted by relatedness. By contrast, most theoreticians have argued that a focal individual's inclusive fitness should exclude any offspring accrued due to the behaviour of relatives. Our approach is based on the notion that long-term evolution follows the genome's 'majority interest' of building coherent bodies that are efficient 'vehicles' for gene propagation. A gene favoured by selection that reduces the propagation of unlinked genes at other loci (e.g. meiotic segregation distorters that lower sperm production) is eventually neutralized by counter-selection throughout the rest of the genome. Most phenotypes will therefore appear as if designed to maximize the propagation of any given gene in a focal individual and its relatives.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic FitnessModels, GeneticPhenotypeReproductionSelection, GeneticadaptationcausalityHamilton's rulekin selectionselfish genesocial evolution

Identifiers

PMID31185857
PMCPMC6571478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.