Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31185730›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow Up of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Consensus Practice from the PERT Consortium.

Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Michael McDaniel, Kamran Ahrar, Abdulah Alrifai, David M Dudzinski, Christina Fanola, Danielle Blais, David Janicke, Roman Melamed, Kerry Mohrien and 25 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05469724 (Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Registry in Patients Admitted With Acute Pulmonary Embolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 161 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05469724 unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Registry in Patients Admitted With Acute Pulmonary Embolism

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsAcute Pulmonary EmbolismArmsRole of ct pulmonary angiography in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) implementation and its clinical value across countries: a scoping review and meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Impact of pulmonary embolism response teams on acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Anticoagulation in Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Risk-Stratified, Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  12. Initial management of intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Belinda Rivera-Lebron1 University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7842-671X
Michael McDaniel2 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kamran Ahrar3 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abdulah Alrifai4 University of Miami of Palm Beach Regional Campus/JFK Hospital, Atlantis, FL, USA.
David M Dudzinski5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christina Fanola6 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Danielle Blais7 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
David Janicke8 University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Roman Melamed9 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kerry Mohrien10 Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth Rozycki7 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Charles B Ross11 Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew J Klein11 Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Parth Rali10 Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicholas R Teman12 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Leoara Yarboro12 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Eugene Ichinose13 Oklahoma Heart Institute, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Aditya M Sharma12 University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Jason A Bartos6 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mahir Elder14 Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Brent Keeling2 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Harold Palevsky16 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Soophia Naydenov17 Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Parijat Sen18 Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nancy Amoroso19 New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Josanna M Rodriguez-Lopez5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
George A Davis20 University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Rachel Rosovsky5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth Rosenfield5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher Kabrhel5 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
James Horowitz19 New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Jay S Giri16 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Victor Tapson21 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard Channick22 University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
PERT Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There have been many advances in the field of PE in the last few years, requiring a careful assessment of their impact on patient care. However, variations in recommendations by different clinical guidelines, as well as lack of robust clinical trials, make clinical decisions challenging. The Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Consortium is an international association created to advance the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of patients with PE. In this consensus practice document, we provide a comprehensive review of the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of acute PE, including both clinical data and consensus opinion to provide guidance for clinicians caring for these patients.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseFollow-Up StudiesHumansPulmonary EmbolismRisk Assessmentacute pulmonary embolismcatheter-directed thrombolysischronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertensionembolectomyinferior vena cava filterpulmonary embolism response teamsystemic thrombolysisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID31185730
PMCPMC6714903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.