ArticleCancers2019
Comparative Analysis of Two Methods for the Detection of
Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer: a bibliometric analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2024.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Pollen genotyping by SABER-MassARRAY reveals that fewer than half of honey bee visits can cross-pollinate a self-incompatible crop.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of EGFR-TKIs combined with craniocerebral radiotherapy on the prognosis ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Identification of a long non-coding RNA signature for predicting prognosis and biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Precision Detection Technology: Equipping Precision Oncology with Wings.Journal of oncology · 2020Review
- Aluminosilicate Nanocomposite on Genosensor: A Prospective Voltammetry Platform for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Analysis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.