Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31185309›Full record

ArticleAcademic pediatrics

We Have All Been Working in Our Own Little Silos Forever: Exploring a Cross-Sector Response to Child Maltreatment.

Kristine A Campbell, Amyanne Wuthrich, Chuck Norlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristine A CampbellDepartment of Pediatrics (KA Campbell and C Norlin) and Department of Internal Medicine (A Wuthrich), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: kristine.campbell@hsc.utah.edu.
Amyanne WuthrichDepartment of Pediatrics (KA Campbell and C Norlin) and Department of Internal Medicine (A Wuthrich), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Chuck NorlinDepartment of Pediatrics (KA Campbell and C Norlin) and Department of Internal Medicine (A Wuthrich), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

What Happens Next: Households After a First-Time Finding of Child AbuseK23HD059850 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CAMPBELL, KRISTINE A · 2010 to 2014
$667k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD059850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA child protective services (CPS) investigation for maltreatment signals risk for childhood toxic stress and poor health outcomes. Despite this, communication between child welfare and health care professionals is rare. We present a qualitative exploration of experiences with, barriers to, and hopes for cross-sector collaboration for children with suspected maltreatment.

methodsWe conducted focus groups with child welfare and health care professionals participating in a cross-sector learning collaborative to improve care for children at high risk for toxic stress. Participants were asked to describe 2 phenomena: identifying and responding to childhood adversities in their professional settings and cross-sector collaboration in cases of suspected maltreatment. Analysis included an iterative process of reading, coding and comparing themes across groups.

resultsHealth care professionals shared positive experiences in screening for social risks in clinic, while child welfare professionals expressed mixed attitudes toward social risk screening during CPS investigations. Consistent with prior research, health care professionals reported limited communication with CPS caseworkers about patients but suggested that relationships with child welfare professionals might reduce these barriers. Child welfare professionals described the poor quality of information provided in referrals from medical settings. Caseworkers also recognized that improved communication could support better understanding of maltreatment concerns and sharing of outcomes of CPS investigation.

conclusionsOur project extends previously published research by describing potential benefits of child welfare and child health care collaboration in cases of suspected maltreatment. Lack of effective cross-sector communication and concerns about confidentiality present significant barriers to uptake of these collaborative practices.

Indexed as

Child Protective ServicesCooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsChildChild AbuseFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMaleQuality ImprovementStress, PsychologicalUnited Statesadverse childhood experienceschild abusechild protective servicesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31185309
PMCPMC6899215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.