ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Robust Free Energy Perturbation Protocols for Creating Molecules in Solution.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-Scale Collaborative Assessment of Binding Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery Using OpenFE.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Monte Carlo simulations for free energies of hydration: Past to present.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- Kartograf: A Geometrically Accurate Atom Mapper for Hybrid-Topology Relative Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Enthalpies and entropies of hydration from Monte Carlo simulations.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Article
- How Robust Is the Ligand Binding Transition State?Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
- Recent PELE Developments and Applications in Drug Discovery Campaigns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Computational Tools for Accurate Binding Free-Energy Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Screening of world approved drugs against highly dynamical spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 using CaverDock and machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Free energy of hydrophilic and hydrophobic pores in lipid bilayers by free energy perturbation of a restraint.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
- Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate methods to estimate free energies play an important role for studying diverse condensed-phase problems in chemistry and biochemistry. The most common methods used in conjunction with molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo statistical mechanics (MC) simulations are free energy perturbation (FEP) and thermodynamic integration (TI). For common applications featuring the conversion of one molecule to another, simulations are run in stages or multiple "λ-windows" to promote convergence of the results. For computation of absolute free energies of solvation or binding, calculations are needed in which the solute is typically annihilated in the solvent and in the complex. The present work addresses identification of optimal protocols for such calculations, specifically, the creation/annihilation of organic molecules in aqueous solution. As is common practice, decoupling of the perturbations for electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions was performed. Consistent with earlier reports, FEP calculations for molecular creations are much more efficient, while annihilations require many more windows and may converge to incorrect values. Strikingly, we find that as few as four windows may be adequate for creation calculations for solutes ranging from argon to ethylbenzene. For a larger druglike molecule, MIF180, which contains 22 non-hydrogen atoms and three rotatable bonds, 10 creation windows are found to be adequate to yield the correct free energy of hydration. Convergence is impeded with procedures that use any sampling in the annihilation direction, and there is no need for postprocessing methods such as the Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.