Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31184976›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Feasibility of a combined strategy of HPV vaccination and screening in Mexico: the FASTER-Tlalpan study experience.

L León-Maldonado, A Cabral, B Brown, G W Ryan, A Maldonado, J Salmerón, B Allen-Leigh, E Lazcano-Ponce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Updates on HPV Vaccination.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L León-Maldonadoa Cátedra CONACYT- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública , Cuernavaca , Morelos , México.ORCID 0000-0003-2106-206X
A Cabralc Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública , Cuernavaca , Morelos , México.
B Brownd Center for Healthy Communities, Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health. University of California, Riverside School of Medicine , Riverside , CA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6348-4108
G W Ryane Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa College of Public Health. Riverside Dr ., Iowa City , LA , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-2644
A Maldonadof Dirección de Salud Reproductiva, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública , Cuernavaca , Morelos , México.
J Salmerónb Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de México , Ciudad de México , México.ORCID 0000-0002-5113-299X
B Allen-Leighf Dirección de Salud Reproductiva, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública , Cuernavaca , Morelos , México.ORCID 0000-0002-9097-2553
E Lazcano-Ponceg Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública , Cuernavaca , Morelos , México.ORCID 0000-0003-1259-6369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a noticeable shift in discussions about cervical cancer, moving from prevention to elimination. Interventions such as FASTER, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and HPV screening are innovative intervention strategies which can be utilized to begin a path to elimination. To explore the feasibility of the FASTER strategy, an evaluation was carried out in eight primary health-care centers within the Tlalpan Health-Jurisdiction of Mexico City between March 2017 and August 2018. A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate three components: infrastructure, patient acceptability, and health-care professionals' perceptions. This included checklists of requirements for the infrastructure rollout of FASTER and interviews with women and health-care professionals. Nearly all (93%) of the 3,474 women aged 25-45 years accepted HPV vaccination as part of a combined vaccination and screening program. The main reason for acceptance was prevention, while having doubts about the vaccine's benefits was the main reason for refusal. Most of the 24 health-care professionals had a positive opinion toward HPV vaccination and identified the need to increase dissemination, inform the population clearly and concisely and currently extend the age range for vaccination. The evaluation of eight primary health-care centers showed they had the necessary infrastructure for the development of a joint HPV prevention strategy, but many centers required improvements to become more efficient. Together these findings suggest that although HPV vaccine acceptance was high, there is the need to increase education and awareness among potential vaccine recipients and health-care professionals to implement the FASTER strategy.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMass ScreeningAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMexicoMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccinescervical cancerFASTERHPV vaccinationscreening

Identifiers

PMID31184976
PMCPMC6746501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.