ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2019
Significant and Distinctive
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Changes in Documentation After Implementing Open Notes in Mental Health Care: Pre-Post Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Impact of Patient Online Record Access on Documentation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Impact of Collaborative Documentation on Person-Centered Care: Textual Analysis of Clinical Notes.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Text mining method to unravel long COVID's clinical condition in hospitalized patients.Cell death & disease · 2024Article
- Changes in Documentation Due to Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Natural Language Processing to Extract Meaningful Information from a Corpus of Written Knowledge in Breast Cancer: Transforming Books into Data.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identifying features of risk periods for suicide attempts using document frequency and language use in electronic health records.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Multilingual RECIST classification of radiology reports using supervised learning.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Open notes sounds great, but will a provider's documentation change? An exploratory study of the effect of open notes on oncology documentation.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- The Views and Experiences of Clinicians Sharing Medical Record Notes With Patients.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Does Patient Access to Clinical Notes Change Documentation?Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOpenNotes is a national movement established in 2010 that gives patients access to their visit notes through online patient portals, and its goal is to improve transparency and communication. To determine whether granting patients access to their medical notes will have a measurable effect on provider behavior, we developed novel methods to quantify changes in the length and frequency of use of
methodsWe analyzed 102,135 notes of 36 hematology/oncology clinicians before and after the OpenNotes debut at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. We applied methods to quantify changes in the length and frequency of use of sequential co-occurrence of words (
resultsThe number of significant
conclusionAlthough the number of significant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.