Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31184777›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Prenatal Alcohol Screening During Pregnancy by Midwives and Nurses.

Lisa M Chiodo, Caitlin Cosmian, Kristy Pereira, Nicole Kent, Robert J Sokol, John H Hannigan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gastroenterologist's Guide to Assess for Alcohol Use.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Screening for Alcohol Use in Pregnancy: a Review of Current Practices and Perspectives.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M ChiodoCollege of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Caitlin CosmianCollege of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7579-8385
Kristy PereiraCollege of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4676-9934
Nicole KentCollege of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Robert J SokolDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
John H HanniganDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol use during pregnancy can have a variety of harmful consequences on the fetus. Lifelong effects include growth restriction, characteristic facial anomalies, and neurobehavioral dysfunction. This range of effects is known as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). There is no amount, pattern, or timing of alcohol use during pregnancy proven safe for a developing embryo or fetus. Therefore, it is important to screen patients for alcohol use, inform them about alcohol's potential effects during pregnancy, encourage abstinence, and refer for intervention if necessary. However, how and how often nurses and midwives inquire about alcohol drinking during pregnancy or use recommended screening tools and barriers they perceive to alcohol screening has not been well established.

methodsThis survey was sent to about 6,000 American midwives, nurse practitioners, and nurses who provide prenatal care about their knowledge of the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure, the prevalence of alcohol use during pregnancy, and practices for screening patients' alcohol use. Participants were recruited by e-mail from the entire membership roster of the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

resultsThere were 578 valid surveys returned (about 9.6%). Analyses showed that 37.7% of the respondents believe drinking alcohol is safe during at least one trimester of pregnancy. Only 35.2% of respondents reported screening to assess patient alcohol use. Only 23.3% reported using a specific screening tool, and few of those were validated screens recommended for use in pregnant women. Respondents who believe alcohol is safe at some point in pregnancy were significantly less likely to screen their patients.

conclusionsRespondents who reported that pregnancy alcohol use is unsafe felt more prepared to educate and intervene with patients regarding alcohol use during pregnancy and FASD than respondents who reported drinking in pregnancy was safe. Perceived alcohol safety and perceived barriers to screening appeared to influence screening practices. Improving prenatal care provider knowledge about the effects of prenatal alcohol exposure and the availability of valid alcohol screening tools will improve detection of drinking during pregnancy, provide more opportunities for meaningful intervention, and ultimately reduce the incidence of FASD.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedEthanolFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMidwiferyNurse PractitionersNursesPregnancyPrenatal CarePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSurveys and QuestionnairesEthanolAlcohol ConsumptionFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisordersFetal Alcohol SyndromeMaternal Alcohol ConsumptionMidwiferyNurse PractitionersPrenatal (Antenatal) Care

Identifiers

PMID31184777
PMCPMC6772020
OpenAlexW2949691084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.