ReviewThe New phytologist2020
Oak symbolism in the light of genomics.
Review in The New phytologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimizing detection bias of somatic mutations in a highly heterozygous oak genome.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Fine-Scale Variation in Soil Properties Promotes Local Taxonomic Diversity of Hybridizing Oak Species (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Response of Pedunculate Oak (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Proteomics research in forest trees: A 2012-2022 update.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- A first draft genome of holm oak (Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Iconic Arable Weeds: The Significance of Corn Poppy (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Massive postglacial gene flow between European white oaks uncovered genes underlying species barriers.The New phytologist · 2020Article
- Modern Strategies to Assess and Breed Forest Tree Adaptation to Changing Climate.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Throughout the Northern Hemisphere, human societies, political systems, and religions have appropriated oaks in symbolic representations. In this review, we explore the possible associations between recent genetic and genomic findings and the symbolic representations of oaks. We first consider the ways in which evolutionary history during the Holocene has tightened links between humans and oaks in Europe, and how this may have led to symbolic representations. We then show how recent findings concerning the structure and evolution of the oak genome have provided additional knowledge about symbolic representations, such as longevity, cohesiveness, and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.