Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183868›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Respiratory motion compensation in interventional liver SPECT using simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear imaging.

Martijn M A Dietze, Remco Bastiaannet, Britt Kunnen, Sandra van der Velden, Marnix G E H Lam, Max A Viergever, Hugo W A M de Jong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The current status and future prospects for molecular imaging-guided precision surgery.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martijn M A DietzeRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Remco BastiaannetRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Britt KunnenRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sandra van der VeldenRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marnix G E H LamRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Max A ViergeverImage Sciences Institute, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Hugo W A M de JongRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University and University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program 646734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantitative accuracy of the single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) reconstruction of the pretreatment procedure of liver radioembolization is crucial for dosimetry; visual quality is important for detecting doses deposited outside the planned treatment volume. Quantitative accuracy is limited by respiratory motion. Conventional gating eliminates motion by count rejection but increases noise, which degrades the visual reconstruction quality. Motion compensation using all counts can be performed if the motion signal and motion vector field over time are known. The measurement of the motion signal of a patient currently requires a device (such as a respiratory belt) attached to the patient, which complicates the acquisition. The motion vector field is generally extracted from a previously acquired four-dimensional scan and can differ from the motion in the scan performed during the intervention. The simultaneous acquisition of fluoroscopic and nuclear projections can be used to obtain both the motion vector field and the projections of the corresponding (moving) activity distribution. This eliminates the need for devices attached to the patient and provides an accurate motion vector field for SPECT reconstruction. Our approach to motion compensation would primarily be beneficial for interventional SPECT because the time-critical setting requires fast scans and no inconvenience of an external apparatus. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of the motion compensation approach for interventional liver SPECT by means of simulations.

methodsNuclear and fluoroscopic projections of a realistic digital human phantom with respiratory motion were generated using fast Monte Carlo simulators. Fluoroscopic projections were sampled at 1-5 Hz. Nuclear data were acquired continuously in list mode. The motion signal was extracted from the fluoroscopic projections by calculating the center-of-mass, which was then used to assign each photon to a corresponding motion bin. The fluoroscopic projections were reconstructed per bin and coregistered, resulting in a motion vector field that was used in the SPECT reconstruction. The influence of breathing patterns, fluoroscopic imaging dose, sampling rate, number of bins, and scanning time was studied. In addition, the motion compensation method was compared with conventional gating to evaluate the detectability of spheres with varying uptake ratios.

resultsThe liver motion signal was accurately extracted from the fluoroscopic projections, provided the motion was stable in amplitude and the sampling rate was greater than 2 Hz. The minimum total fluoroscopic dose for the proposed method to function in a 5-min scan was 10 µGy. Although conventional gating improved the quantitative reconstruction accuracy, substantial background noise was observed in the short scans because of the limited counts available. The proposed method similarly improved the quantitative accuracy, but generated reconstructions with higher visual quality. The proposed method provided better visualization of low-contrast features than when using gating.

conclusionThe proposed motion compensation method has the potential to improve SPECT reconstruction quality. The method eliminates the need for external devices to measure the motion signal and generates an accurate motion vector field for reconstruction. A minimal increase in the fluoroscopic dose is required to substantially improve the results, paving the way for clinical use.

Indexed as

FluoroscopyMovementRespirationTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverPhantoms, ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioTime Factorsmotion compensationradioembolizationSPECT

Identifiers

PMID31183868
PMCPMC6851796
OpenAlexW2951264952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.