ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020
[
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agents for Fluorescence-Guided Glioblastoma Surgery.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- [Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical Advances and Perspectives in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Highly effective liquid and solid phase extraction methods to concentrate radioiodine isotopes for radioiodination chemistry.Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals · 2022Article
- Radiopharmaceutical therapy in cancer: clinical advances and challenges.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is a continuous search for imaging techniques with high sensitivity and specificity for brain tumors. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has shown promise, though many PET agents either have a low tumor specificity or impractical physical half-lives. [ PROCEDURES: Adult patients with new or suspected recurrence of high-grade primary or metastatic brain tumors (N = 27) were injected with [
resultsPositive uptake with high TBR was detected in all but one patient with a final diagnosis of primary/recurrent brain tumor (12/13) and in less than half of patients with treatment-related changes (5/12). Concordance between [
conclusionsThe uptake pattern in these patients suggests a very high sensitivity of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.