Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2020
Trocar site closure with a novel anchor-based (neoClose
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Novel Trocar-Site Closure Device in Laparoscopic Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- Laparoscopic port-site fascial closure device review and catalog.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Observational
- Trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy in a middle-aged Japanese woman: an initial case report after 40 years of experience at a single center and a brief literature review.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2022Review
- Evidence-based surgery for laparoscopic appendectomy: A stepwise systematic review.Surgery open science · 2021Review
- Trocar-site hernia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a 20-year, single-center experience.Chinese medical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with obesity have a higher risk of trocar site hernia. The objective of the present study was to compare a standard suture passer versus the neoClose
methodsThis is a randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms. Thirty five patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m
resultsThe use of the neoClose
conclusionsUse of the neoClose
Indexed as
Identifiers
31183797What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.