Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183792›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2020

Small bowel obstructions following the use of barbed suture: a review of the literature and analysis of the MAUDE database.

Benjamin Clapp, William Klingsporn, Carlos Lodeiro, Ellen Wicker, Loyd Christensen, Robert Jones, Alan Tyroch

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05351970 (Barbed Suture vs. Monofilament for Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure, a Retrospective Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05351970 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Barbed Suture vs. Monofilament for Emergency Midline Laparotomy Closure, a Retrospective Analysis

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled128ConditionsIncisional Hernia of Midline of AbdomenArmsBarbed
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Robotic eTEP inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin ClappTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA. benjamin.clapp@ttuhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-4708
William KlingspornTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Carlos LodeiroTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Ellen WickerTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Loyd ChristensenTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Robert JonesTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.
Alan TyrochTexas Tech University HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, 1700 N. Mesa, El Paso, TX, 79902, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarbed suture has been adopted across all surgical specialties. One of the infrequent complications seen with the use of barbed suture is small bowel obstructions (SBOs). In this study, we perform a review of the literature and the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database (MAUDE) to characterize SBOs after the use of barbed sutures in a variety of operative procedures.

methodsA review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed and Ovid. We used the search terms: "barbed," "suture," "bowel," and "obstructions." For each case report, we examined the initial surgical procedure, type of barbed suture used, the type of complication, the time to complication, the presentation, and the type of operative interventions required. We did the same with the MAUDE database.

resultsOur review of the literature revealed 18 different cases of SBO secondary to the use of barbed suture. The four most common procedures, with a total of four cases each, were inguinal hernia procedures, myomectomy, hysterectomy, and pelvic floor reconstructive procedures. The average time of presentation to SBO was found to be 26.3 days post-op (1-196 days). A total of 16 patients (88.9%) presented with abdominal pain. Other common complaints included vomiting (33.3%), abdominal distension (27.8%), oral intolerance (22.2%), and constipation (16.7%). A total of 5 cases were also found to have a possible volvulus on computed tomography (CT), and 2 cases were reported to have strangulation. The MAUDE database had 14 cases reporting on obstruction.

conclusionsSurgeons should have a high index of suspicion for SBO if a patient presents with obstructive symptoms after a surgery that used barbed suture. This will often present as a mesenteric volvulus on CT. These particular SBOs require operative exploration, with laparoscopy being successful in the majority of cases.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignFemaleHernia, InguinalHumansHysterectomyIntestinal ObstructionIntestinal VolvulusIntestine, SmallLaparoscopyPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsSuturesSuture TechniquesUterine MyomectomyBarbed sutureComplicationsLaparoscopySmall bowel obstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.