Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183766›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

Predictors of Mammography Uptake Among Italian Women Aged 50-69: a Cross-sectional Study.

Brigid Unim, Roberto Boggi, Massimo Napoli, Roberta Fulgenzi, Adelaide Landi, Giuseppe La Torre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mammography uptake among the female staff of King Saud University.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  5. Knowledge about cancer screening programmes in Sardinia.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brigid UnimDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Roberto BoggiLocal Health Unit ASL Roma A, Department of Prevention - Hygiene and Public Health Service, 00187, Rome, Italy.
Massimo NapoliLocal Health Unit ASL Roma A, Department of Prevention - Hygiene and Public Health Service, 00187, Rome, Italy.
Roberta FulgenziLocal Health Unit ASL Roma A, Department of Prevention - Hygiene and Public Health Service, 00187, Rome, Italy.
Adelaide LandiLocal Health Unit ASL Roma A, Department of Prevention - Hygiene and Public Health Service, 00187, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe La TorreDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy. giuseppe.latorre@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening coverage is of concern in several countries, including Italy. The aim of the study is to assess predictors of participation in the mammography screening program at the Local Health Unit RMA (Rome, Italy). A telephone-based questionnaire was administered to randomly selected eligible women. The study population was interviewed by the personnel of the health center. Five hundred two women were interviewed, of which 264(52.6%) have attended the breast cancer screening program at least once. The attendees received the invitation letter more often than the non-attendees (88.3% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.002) and were more willing to participate (85.6% vs. 69.3%; p < 0.001). Employees were more among the non-attendees of the screening program (66% vs. 52.3%; p = 0.002). Age over-61 (OR = 2.75; 95%CI 1.84-4.09), receiving the invitation letter (OR = 2.54; 95%CI = 1.52-4.24), and intention to participate (OR = 3.09; 95%CI = 1.94-4.91) were significantly associated with participation in the screening program. Although the invitation rate of the Local Health Unit RMA has improved in recent years, the mammography uptake rate remains very low. The presence of opportunistic screening activities, younger age, and low educational status could explain the low participation rates. Organizational barriers (e.g., screening hours coinciding with work hours, screening facilities located far away) may also limit participation. Major efforts should be made towards the regulation of opportunistic screening activities and reorganization of the screening centers and communication strategies to better comply with the needs of the target population. In this light, the involvement of different healthcare professionals, especially general practitioners, and gynecologists, is crucial.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansItalyMammographyMiddle AgedPrognosisSurveys and QuestionnairesAttendance rateBreast cancerMammographyScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.