Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183519›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2019

Improved peptide-MHC class II interaction prediction through integration of eluted ligand and peptide affinity data.

Christian Garde, Sri H Ramarathinam, Emma C Jappe, Morten Nielsen, Jens V Kringelum, Thomas Trolle, Anthony W Purcell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Therapeutic cancer vaccines: advancements, challenges, and prospects.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Toward Drug-Like Multispecific Antibodies by Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian GardeEvaxion Biotech, Bredgade 34E, DK-1260, Copenhagen, Denmark. cg@evaxion-biotech.com.
Sri H RamarathinamDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology & Infection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
Emma C JappeEvaxion Biotech, Bredgade 34E, DK-1260, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten NielsenDepartment of Bio and Health Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Jens V KringelumEvaxion Biotech, Bredgade 34E, DK-1260, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas TrolleEvaxion Biotech, Bredgade 34E, DK-1260, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anthony W PurcellDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology & Infection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia. anthony.purcell@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigen presentation is a key component in eliciting a CD4+ T cell response. Precise prediction of peptide-MHC (pMHC) interactions has thus become a cornerstone in defining epitope candidates for rational vaccine design. Current pMHC prediction tools have, so far, primarily focused on inference from in vitro binding affinity. In the current study, we collate a large set of MHC class II eluted ligands generated by mass spectrometry to guide the prediction of MHC class II antigen presentation. We demonstrate that models developed on eluted ligands outperform those developed on pMHC binding affinity data. The predictive performance can be further enhanced by combining the eluted ligand and pMHC affinity data in a single prediction model. Furthermore, by including ligand data, the peptide length preference of MHC class II can be accurately learned by the prediction model. Finally, we demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art prediction method, NetMHCIIpan, on an external dataset of eluted ligands and appears superior in identifying CD4+ T cell epitopes.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHLA AntigensHumansLigandsPeptidesProtein BindingReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHLA AntigensLigandsPeptidesCD4+ epitopeLigand predictionMachine learningMass spectrometryMHC class IIPan methodPeptidomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.