ArticleHeart and vessels2019
Oral anticoagulant use and clinical outcomes in elderly Japanese patients: findings from the SAKURA AF Registry.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Observational
- Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Elderly and Non-Elderly Japanese Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation - Competing Risk Analysis From the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry.Circulation reports · 2022Article
- Antithrombotic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Risk of major bleeding in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation on direct oral anticoagulants: real world experience.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used in aged Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but outcome data for such patients are limited. We compared outcomes between 1895 (58.5%) patients aged < 75 years (non-elderly), 1078 (33.3%) 75-84 years (elderly) and 264 (8.2%) ≥ 85 years (very elderly) enrolled in a prospective multicenter registry. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median follow-up: 39.3 months) revealed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) among the very elderly relative to that among the non-elderly or elderly (3.2 vs. 1.2 and 1.5 events per 100 patient-years, p < 0.001). Major bleeding in the non-elderly group was significantly infrequent relative to that among the elderly or very elderly group (1.1 vs. 1.6 vs. 1.8 events, p = 0.033). After multivariate adjustment, the stroke/SE incidence was comparable between DOAC and warfarin users, regardless of age, but major bleeding decreased significantly among very elderly DOAC users (adjusted HR 0.220, 95% CI 0.042-0.920). The greater increasing incidence of stroke/SE than major bleeding as patients age suggests that stroke prevention should outweigh the bleeding risk when anticoagulants are being considered for aged patients. Our data indicated that DOACs can be a therapeutic option for stroke prevention in very elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.