Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183442›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2019

Randomized clinical trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme

N Geubbels, I Evren, Y I Z Acherman, S C Bruin, A W J M van de Laar, M B Hoen, L Maurits de Brauw

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Emergency in obese patients: a reply to SOBA UK.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N GeubbelsDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4925-9238
I EvrenDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Y I Z AchermanDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.
S C BruinDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.
A W J M van de LaarDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.
M B HoenDepartment of Anaesthesiology Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.
L Maurits de BrauwDepartment of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Slotervaart Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Slotervaartziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have led to a decreased duration of hospital stay in several surgical fields, but have not been fully tested in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for obesity. This study aimed to investigate an ERAS programme Methods: Between January 2013 and July 2014, patients undergoing LRYGB were randomized to ERAS or conventional care. The primary outcome was functional hospital stay, defined as the time between end of surgery and when predefined discharge criteria (pain adequately controlled, fever and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) absent, full liquid diet tolerated, mobilized and feeling fit for discharge) were met. Secondary outcomes were total length of hospital stay, 30-day complication and mortality rates, duration of surgery, time spent on the recovery ward and health-related quality of life. Results: A total 220 patients were randomized to ERAS (110 patients) or conventional (110) care. Patients in the ERAS group had shorter functional hospital stay (17·4 Conclusion: Patients under ERAS care recovered faster after LRYGB surgery than those receiving conventional care, with no increase in readmission and postoperative morbidity rates. Registration number: NTR3853 (http://www.trialregister.nl/).

Indexed as

AdultEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFemaleGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMortalityObesity, MorbidOperative TimePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Identifiers

PMID31183442
PMCPMC6551390
OpenAlexW2923882699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.