Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183441›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2019

Meta-analysis of postoperative pain using non-sutured or sutured single-layer open mesh repair for inguinal hernia.

S van Steensel, L K van Vugt, A K Al Omar, E H H Mommers, S O Breukink, L P S Stassen, B Winkens, N D Bouvy

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Does the Type of Permanent Mesh Matter for Inguinal Hernia Repair?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S van SteenselDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
L K van VugtDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
A K Al OmarDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
E H H MommersDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
S O BreukinkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
L P S StassenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
B WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.
N D BouvyDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic postoperative pain occurs in up to 21·7 per cent of patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair. Several mesh fixation techniques using glue or self-gripping meshes have been developed to reduce postoperative pain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate RCTs comparing adhesional/self-gripping and sutured single-layer open mesh fixations in the repair of inguinal herniation, with postoperative pain as endpoint. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically for RCTs according to the PRISMA guidelines; the study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42017056373). Different fixation methods were analysed. The primary outcome, chronic pain, was defined as a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of at least 3 at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were mean VAS score at 1 week and at 1 month after surgery. Results: Twenty-three studies including 5190 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Adhesional (self-adhering or glued) or self-gripping fixation methods were associated with a significantly lower VAS score at 1 week (mean difference -0·49, 95 per cent c.i. -0·81 to -0·17; Conclusion: There was no difference in the incidence of chronic pain 12 months after different mesh repair fixation techniques despite significant reductions in short-term postoperative pain favouring a non-sutured technique. There were no differences in recurrence rates or in rates of other complications at 1 year.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainEquipment DesignFemaleHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceSurgical Mesh

Identifiers

PMID31183441
PMCPMC6551402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.