Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183332›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2019

Long-term effect of bariatric surgery versus conventional therapy in obese Korean patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Ji Yeon Park, Yoonseok Heo, Yong Jin Kim, Joong-Min Park, Seong-Min Kim, Do-Joong Park, Sang Kuon Lee, Sang-Moon Han, Kyung-Won Shim, Yeon Ji Lee and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bariatric surgery for treatment of morbid obesity in adults.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. East Asian perspectives in metabolic and bariatric surgery.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ji Yeon ParkDepartment of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Yoonseok HeoDepartment of Surgery, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Yong Jin KimDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1222-2121
Joong-Min ParkDepartment of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong-Min KimDepartment of Surgery, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Do-Joong ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sang Kuon LeeDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Moon HanDepartment of Surgery, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung-Won ShimDepartment of Family Medicine, Ewha Women's University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon Ji LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Ja Youn LeeNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
Jin-Won KwonNational Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLong-term results following bariatric surgery compared to conventional treatments has never been reported in morbidly obese Korean patients. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of bariatric surgery in morbidly obese Korean patients compared to conventional medical treatments.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 137 obese subjects between January 2008 and February 2011 with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m

resultsThe median follow-up period was 72.1 months (range 19.3-109.7 months). At the last follow-up, the surgery group showed a greater amount of total weight loss than the conventional treatment group (24.9% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001). The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension significantly decreased in the surgery group, while the conventional treatment group showed a marked increase in these comorbidities. In the surgery group, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieved comparable long-term weight loss (26.5% vs. 22.4%, respectively; P = 0.087).

conclusionIn the long-term, bariatric surgery achieved and maintained significantly greater weight reduction, as well as a decrease in obesity-related comorbidities, than did conventional medical therapy in morbidly obese Korean patients.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryGastrectomyGastric bypassMorbid obesity

Identifiers

PMID31183332
PMCPMC6543048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.