Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183325›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2019

Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management.

Pierpaolo Biondetti, Enrico Maria Fumarola, Anna Maria Ierardi, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05727956 (Salvage Surgeries for Splanchnic Artery Aneurysms After Failed Endovascular Therapies), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05727956 completednot on this map

Salvage Surgeries for Splanchnic Artery Aneurysms After Failed Endovascular Therapies: Cases Series

TypeobservationalSponsorChina Medical University HospitalRan2019 to 2023Enrolled5ConditionsFailure in Endovascular Therapy, Splanchnic Aneurysm, Mass Effect, SurgeryArmsAneurysmectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hepatic artery stenting with Viabahn.CVIR endovascular · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pierpaolo BiondettiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Enrico Maria FumarolaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Anna Maria IerardiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical intervention in the pancreas region is complex and carries the risk of complications, also of vascular nature. Bleeding after pancreatic surgery is rare but characterized by high mortality. This review reports epidemiology, classification, diagnosis and treatment strategies of hemorrhage occurring after pancreatic surgery, focusing on the techniques, roles and outcomes of interventional radiology (IR) in this setting. We then describe the roles and techniques of IR in the treatment of other less common types of vascular complications after pancreatic surgery, such as portal vein (PV) stenosis, portal hypertension and bleeding of varices.

Indexed as

Embolizationinterventional radiology (IR)pancreatic resectionpostpancreatectomy hemorrhagestent-graft

Identifiers

PMID31183325
PMCPMC6534758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.