Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183322›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2019

Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in local complications of acute pancreatitis.

Emanuele Grassedonio, Patrizia Toia, Ludovico La Grutta, Stefano Palmucci, Tommaso Smeraldi, Giuseppe Cutaia, Domenico Albano, Federico Midiri, Massimo Galia, Massimo Midiri

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comparative Evaluation of USG, CT, and MRI in Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current Progress in the CT- and MRI-Based Detection and Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis Complications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  8. Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuele GrassedonioDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Patrizia ToiaDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ludovico La GruttaDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Stefano PalmucciDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Catania, Italy.
Tommaso SmeraldiDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe CutaiaDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Domenico AlbanoUnit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Federico MidiriDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo GaliaDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo MidiriDepartment of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) represents a pancreas inflammation of sudden onset that can present different degrees of severity. AP is a frequent cause of acute abdomen and its complications are still a cause of death. Biliary calculosis and alcohol abuse are the most frequent cause of AP. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not necessary for the diagnosis of AP but they are fundamental tools for the identification of the cause, degree severity and AP complications. AP severity assessment is in fact one of the most important issue in disease management. Contrast-enhanced CT is preferred in the emergency setting and is considered the gold standard in patients with AP. MRI is comparable to CT for the diagnosis of AP but requires much more time so it is not usually chosen in the emergency scenario. Complications of AP can be distinguished in localized and generalized. Among the localized complications, we can identify: acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC), pseudocysts, acute necrotic collections (ANC), walled off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), venous thrombosis, pseudoaneurysms and haemorrhage. Multiple organ failure syndrome (MOFS) and sepsis are possible generalized complications of AP. In this review, we focus on CT and MRI findings in local complications of AP and when and how to perform CT and MRI. We paid also attention to recent developments in diagnostic classification of AP complications.

Indexed as

Acute pancreatitis (AP)computed tomography (CT)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Identifiers

PMID31183322
PMCPMC6534767
OpenAlexW2935823063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.