ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019
ERAS and patient reported outcomes in thoracic surgery: a review of current data.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life during the first 3 months after uniportalJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Feeling safe by means of remote cardiac rhythm surveillance after open cardiac surgery: a mixed method pilot feasibility study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Observational
- The implementation of an electronic symptom management system to monitor postoperative pain in thoracic surgery patients: A multicenter evaluation.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Review
- RETRACTED: Effects of rapid rehabilitation nursing on surgical-site wound infection and postoperative complications of patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Implementation of an innovative ERAS protocol in cardiac surgery: A qualitative evaluation from patients' perspective.PloS one · 2024Article
- Interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- [Comparison of Quality of Life of the Patients Three Months after Uniportal and Multiportal Thoracoscopic Lobectomy].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2023Article
- Medical staff's perception of factors contributing to accelerated rehabilitation in patients with cervical spinal cord injury: A qualitative research.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Can postoperative complications be reduced by the application of ERAS protocols in operated non-small cell lung cancer patients?Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2023Article
- Observational
- Article
- Moving towards patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: implementation lessons from the BREAST-Q.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Enhanced recovery of postoperative nursing for single-port thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Correlation Between Pain Intensity and Quality of Recovery After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer Resection.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology: Review of literature.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022Review
- The Effect of Single-Shot Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) on Opioid Consumption for Various Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality-focused, cost-effective, patient-centered care is at the forefront of current healthcare reform. Recent data show that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) results in improved surgical outcomes and decreased hospital costs. As a result, ERAS has been widely accepted among multiple surgical subspecialties as a modality for increasing the value of healthcare delivered to our patients. While this objective data is convincing for practitioners and administrators alike, how ERAS directly impacts the patient experience is unclear. Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are starting to drive patterns of healthcare delivery and influence surgical decision-making. In order to improve surgical outcomes and deliver patient-centered care, it is imperative that clinicians start reviewing objective metrics contained within morbidity and mortality data alongside subjective data regarding patients' experience. This article reviews the current data surrounding both ERAS and PROs within thoracic surgery and investigates how the two concepts are ultimately related.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.