Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31183076›Full record

SynthesisChiropractic & manual therapies2019

The effects of spinal manipulation on performance-related outcomes in healthy asymptomatic adult population: a systematic review of best evidence.

Melissa Corso, Silvano A Mior, Sarah Batley, Taylor Tuff, Sophia da Silva-Oolup, Scott Howitt, John Srbely

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigating the research capacity and productivity of Canadian sports chiropractors.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa Corso1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5383-5675
Silvano A Mior1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.
Sarah Batley1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.
Taylor Tuff1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.
Sophia da Silva-Oolup1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.
Scott Howitt1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.
John Srbely1Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, North York, ON M2H 3J1 Canada.
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for improving athletic performance in healthy athletes is unclear. Assessing the effect of SMT on other performance outcomes in asymptomatic populations may provide insight into the management of athletes where direct evidence may not be available. Our objective was to systematically review the literature on the effect of SMT on performance-related outcomes in asymptomatic adults. Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from 1990 to March 23, 2018. Inclusion criteria was any study examining a performance-related outcome of SMT in asymptomatic adults. Methodological quality was assessed using the SIGN criteria. Studies with a low risk of bias were considered scientifically admissible for a best evidence synthesis. We calculated the between group mean change and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of 1415 articles screened, 20 studies had low risk of bias, seven were randomized crossover trials, 10 were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and three were RCT pilot trials. Four studies showed SMT had no effect on physiological parameters at rest or during exercise. There was no effect of SMT on scapular kinematics or transversus abdominus thickness. Three studies identified changes in muscle activation of the upper or lower limb, compared to two that did not. Five studies showed changes in range of motion (ROM). One study showed an increase lumbar proprioception and two identified changes in baropodometric variables after SMT. Sport-specific studies show no effect of SMT except for a small increase in basketball free-throw accuracy. Conclusion: The preponderance of evidence suggests that SMT in comparison to sham or other interventions does not enhance performance-based outcomes in asymptomatic adult population. All studies are exploratory with immediate effects. In the few studies suggesting a positive immediate effect, the importance of such change is uncertain. Further high-quality performance specific studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceManipulation, SpinalAsymptomatic DiseasesAthletesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularAsymptomaticAthleteHealthyPerformanceSpinal manipulationSport

Identifiers

PMID31183076
PMCPMC6555009
OpenAlexW2948473387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.