Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182942›Full record

ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology

Adalimumab Dose-Escalation Therapy Is Effective in Refractory Crohn's Disease Patients with Loss of Response to Adalimumab, Especially in Cases without Previous Infliximab Treatment.

Taketo Suzuki, Tsutomu Mizoshita, Tomoya Sugiyama, Yoshikazu Hirata, Yoshihide Kimura, Yuka Suzuki, Tomonori Yamada, Hironobu Tsukamoto, Takashi Mizushima, Naomi Sugimura and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Taketo SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Tsutomu MizoshitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoya SugiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Yoshikazu HirataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Japan.
Yoshihide KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuka SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomonori YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hironobu TsukamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Japan.
Takashi MizushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, Japan.
Naomi SugimuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahito KatanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoshi TanidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiromi KataokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Makoto SasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPAichi Medical University · JPGifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPKasugai Municipal Hospital · JPNagoya Medical Center · JPNagoya Memorial Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsAdalimumab dose escalation is one of the most important options in refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab, since there are few reports of adalimumab dose escalation, especially in East Asia.

methodsThe clinical response to adalimumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab was evaluated retrospectively, using the Crohn's disease activity index score, serum C-reactive protein levels, and endoscopic analyses.

resultsOf the 203 Crohn's disease patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor, 14 refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab received adalimumab dose-escalation therapy. The C-reactive protein level was significantly reduced from the start to weeks 12 and 52 of adalimumab dose escalation in the whole group, although there were no significant reductions of Crohn's disease activity index scores. Both Crohn's disease activity index scores and C-reactive protein levels were significantly reduced from the start to weeks 12 and 52 of adalimumab dose escalation in patients without previous infliximab treatment, although C-reactive protein levels were positive in all cases with previous infliximab exposure at weeks 12 and 52. Endoscopic mucosal healing was achieved with adalimumab dose escalation in 2 cases without previous infliximab treatment.

conclusionsAdalimumab dose-escalation therapy is effective in refractory Crohn's disease patients with loss of response to adalimumab, especially in cases without previous infliximab treatment.

Indexed as

Adalimumab dose escalationCrohn's diseaseLoss of response

Identifiers

PMID31182942
PMCPMC6547276
OpenAlexW2914537607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.