Catalytic machinery of enzymes expanded.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Research progress in the application of molecular imprinting technology in catalysis].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026
   Article
2. Improving the hydrophilic microenvironment surrounding the catalytic site of fructosyltransferase enhances its catalytic ability.Biotechnology letters · 2025
   Article
3. Nanozymes: a bibliometrics review.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024
   Review
4. Carbon Nanomaterials (CNMs) and Enzymes: From Nanozymes to CNM-Enzyme Conjugates and Biodegradation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Design and evolution of an enzyme with a non-canonical organocatalytic mechanism.2019

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as