ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2019
Recent progress in global newborn health: thinking beyond acute to strategic care?
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Observational
- Clusters and associations of adverse neonatal events with adult risk of multimorbidity: A secondary analysis of birth cohort data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Parental participation in newborn care in the view of health care providers in Uganda: a qualitative study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Closer and closer? Maternal immunization: current promise, future horizons.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in neonatal care globally highlight ongoing disparities in neonatal outcomes between low-income countries (LICs) and high-income countries (HICs). Drivers of this gap are primarily prematurity, infection, and intrapartum-related events. Significant success is being achieved; however, for neonatal outcomes in LIC to approximate those of HICs within a generation, acceleration of the current trajectory of progress is needed. This requires a renewed focus on newborn-specific and newborn-sensitive strategies. Newborn-specific strategies are those directly affecting the well-being of the neonate. Newborn-sensitive strategies address the broader macro-environmental drivers that affect underlying neonatal outcomes such as decreased poverty, improved sanitation, and increased maternal empowerment and health. To create such an enabling macro-environment requires significant political will, financing, advocacy, and policy generation. This manuscript highlights recent advances in newborn research, programming, policy, and funding, and highlights key opportunities to bend the curve on advancing neonatal health globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31182774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.