Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182736›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Subjectivity and complexity of facial attractiveness.

Miguel Ibáñez-Berganza, Ambra Amico, Vittorio Loreto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Baby face enlarges perceived reachable space.Experimental brain research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Effect of Wearing a Mask on Facial Attractiveness.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022
    Article
  11. The Impact of Dental Midline on Asymmetric Faces: Perspective of Laypersons and Dentists.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel Ibáñez-BerganzaSapienza University of Rome, Physics Department, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185, Rome, Italy. miguel.berganza@roma1.infn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-1380
Ambra AmicoSapienza University of Rome, Physics Department, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio LoretoSapienza University of Rome, Physics Department, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2506-2289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin and meaning of facial beauty represent a longstanding puzzle. Despite the profuse literature devoted to facial attractiveness, its very nature, its determinants and the nature of inter-person differences remain controversial issues. Here we tackle such questions proposing a novel experimental approach in which human subjects, instead of rating natural faces, are allowed to efficiently explore the face-space and "sculpt" their favorite variation of a reference facial image. The results reveal that different subjects prefer distinguishable regions of the face-space, highlighting the essential subjectivity of the phenomenon. The different sculpted facial vectors exhibit strong correlations among pairs of facial distances, characterising the underlying universality and complexity of the cognitive processes, and the relative relevance and robustness of the different facial distances.

Indexed as

BeautyModels, TheoreticalAdultFaceFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID31182736
PMCPMC6557895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.