Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31182633›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Dynamic Causal Modelling of Active Vision.

Thomas Parr, M Berk Mirza, Hayriye Cagnan, Karl J Friston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
  3. An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inferring What to Do (And What Not to).Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas ParrWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, thomas.parr.12@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-5743
M Berk MirzaWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9355-2052
Hayriye CagnanMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit at the University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, United Kingdom, and.
Karl J FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R020418/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we draw from recent theoretical work on active perception, which suggests that the brain makes use of an internal (i.e., generative) model to make inferences about the causes of sensations. This view treats visual sensations as consequent on action (i.e., saccades) and implies that visual percepts must be actively constructed via a sequence of eye movements. Oculomotor control calls on a distributed set of brain sources that includes the dorsal and ventral frontoparietal (attention) networks. We argue that connections from the frontal eye fields to ventral parietal sources represent the mapping from "where", fixation location to information derived from "what" representations in the ventral visual stream. During scene construction, this mapping must be learned, putatively through changes in the effective connectivity of these synapses. Here, we test the hypothesis that the coupling between the dorsal frontal cortex and the right temporoparietal cortex is modulated during saccadic interrogation of a simple visual scene. Using dynamic causal modeling for magnetoencephalography with (male and female) human participants, we assess the evidence for changes in effective connectivity by comparing models that allow for this modulation with models that do not. We find strong evidence for modulation of connections between the two attention networks; namely, a disinhibition of the ventral network by its dorsal counterpart.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdolescentAdultAttentionCausalityConnectomeCultureDominance, CerebralFemaleFixation, OcularFrontal LobeHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleNerve NetParietal Lobeactive visionattentiondynamic causal modellingeye-trackingmagnetoencephalographyvisual neglect

Identifiers

PMID31182633
PMCPMC6687902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.